Skip to main content
Log in

Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
European Journal of Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article addresses the strength and character of intergenerational family solidarity under different family cultures and welfare state regimes in order to answer the following two questions: (1) Is intergenerational solidarity stronger under the more collectivist southern family tradition than under the more individualist northern tradition? (2) Is more generous access to social care services a risk or a resource for family care? These questions are explored with data from the OASIS project, a comparative study among the urban populations aged 25+ (n=6,106) in Norway, England, Germany, Spain, and Israel. The findings indicate that the welfare state has not crowded out the family in elder care, but has rather helped the generations establish more independent relationships. Intergenerational solidarity is substantial in both the northern and southern welfare state regimes, and seems to vary in character more than in strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The OASIS project was funded under the Fifth Framework Programme of the European Union, Contract no. QLK6-TC-1999–02182, project coordinator Ariela Lowenstein, University of Haifa. For more details see Daatland and Herlofson (2001) and Lowenstein and Ogg (2003).

References

  • Bengtson VL, Roberts REL (1991) Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. J Marriage Fam 53:856–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daatland SO (1990) What are families for? On family solidarity and preferences for help. Ageing Soc 10:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daatland SO (1997) Family solidarity, popular opinion, and the elderly: perspectives from Norway. Ageing Int 1:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2001) Ageing, intergenerational relations, care systems and quality of life. An introduction to the OASIS project. Oslo: NOVA, report 14–2001

  • Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2003) ‘Lost solidarity’ or ’changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing Soc 23:537–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2004) Familie, velferdsstat og aldring. Familiesolidaritet i et europeisk perspektiv. Oslo: NOVA rapport 7–2004

  • Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers A (1988) The new long-term care insurance program in Germany. J Aging Soc Policy 10(1):77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera M (1996) The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. J Eur Soc Policy 6(1):17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch J, Mason J (1993) Negotiating family responsibilities. Tavistock/Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Katan J, Lowenstein A (2001) Basing welfare services in a legal infra structure—implications of the Long-term Care Insurance Law. Gerontology 27(1):55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli M (1999) Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies 1

  • Künemund H, Rein M (1999) There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing Soc 19:93–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee GR, Peek CW, Coward RT (1998) Race differences in filial responsibility expectations among older parents. J Marriage Fam 60:404–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingsom S (1997) The substitution issue. Care policies and their consequences for family care. Oslo: NOVA, report 6–1997

  • Litwak E (1985) Helping the elderly: the complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) (2003) OASIS. Old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein A, Katz R (2005) Living arrangements, family solidarity and life satisfaction of two generations of immigrants. Ageing Soc 25:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher K, Pillemer K (1998) Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent–child relations in later life. J Marriage Fam 60:413–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall VW, Matthews SH, Rosenthal CJ (1993) Elusiveness of family life: a challenge for the sociology of aging. In: Maddox GL, Lawton MP (eds) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: focus on kinship, aging and social change. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar J, Warman A (1996) Family obligations in Europe. Family Policy Studies Centre, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Motel-Klingebiel A, Tesch-Römer C, von Kondratowitz H-J (2003) ‘The quantitative survey’. In: Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) OASIS old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa, pp 63–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Reher DS (1998) Family ties in western Europe: persistent contrasts. Popul Dev Rev 24(2):203–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein M, Bengtson VL (1997) Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult–child relationships in American families. Am J Soc 103(2):429–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström G (1994) Care by families: an overview of trends. In: Hennesy P (ed) Caring for frail elderly people in Europe. New directions in care. Paris: OECD, Social Policy Studies no 14, pp 15–55

  • UN (2002) World population ageing 1950–2050

  • von Kondratowitz HJ, Tesch-Römer C, Motel-Klingebiel A (2002) Establishing systems of care in Germany: a lpng and winding road. Aging Clin Exp Res 14(4):239–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Kondratowitz HJ (2003) Comparing welfare states. In: Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) OASIS old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30(6):473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe A (1989) Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligations. University of California Press, Berkely

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svein Olav Daatland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daatland, S.O., Lowenstein, A. Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance. Eur J Ageing 2, 174–182 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-005-0001-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-005-0001-1

Keywords

Navigation